登录    注册    忘记密码

详细信息

代词性和指示性间接回指语及其认知基础     被引量:22

Pronominal and Demonstrative Indirect Anaphors and Their Cognitive Bases

文献类型:期刊文献

中文题名:代词性和指示性间接回指语及其认知基础

英文题名:Pronominal and Demonstrative Indirect Anaphors and Their Cognitive Bases

作者:项成东[1]

机构:[1]绍兴文理学院外国语学院

年份:2004

期号:3

起止页码:10

中文期刊名:外语与外语教学

外文期刊名:Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

收录:CSTPCD、、北大核心2000、国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库、北大核心

语种:中文

中文关键词:间接回指语;认知级别;已知信息等级结构;顺应

外文关键词:indirect anaphors, cognitive status, Givenness Hierarchy, Accommodation

中文摘要:本文试图探讨英语自然话语中代词性和指示性间接回指语这一现象。收集的语料表明:只有极少数代词性和指示性间接回指语的形式符合Gundel et al.(1993)提出的已知信息等级结构中的合适用法。作者认为这一现象应该视为受话者可以顺应的轻度违规行为。之所以这么认为,一是由于较之其他典型间接回指语,这种形式的用法出现的频率相对较少;二是由于准确标明所指对象有时无关紧要;三是由于这种形式主要出现在非规范、随意的语体中。

外文摘要:This paper attempts to make a study of pronominal and demonstrative indirect anaphors in English naturally occurring discourse. On the basis of the fact that only a small percentage of such forms meet the conditions for appropriate use encoded in Givenness Hierarchy proposed by Gundel et al. (1993), the author argues that they should be treated as minor violations which the hearer can easily accommodate. Such an account is supported in part by the relative infrequency of the forms in question compared to other types of indirect anaphors, and in part by the fact precise specification of the referent is often unnecessary as well as by the fact they occur primarily in unplanned, casual discourse.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©绍兴文理学院 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-8
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心