文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：具身认知运动的批判性审思与清理

英文题名：Embodied Cognition Movement:A Critical Reflection

作者：陈巍[1,2]

机构：[1]绍兴文理学院心理学系;[2]浙江大学语言与认知研究中心

年份：2017

卷号：0

期号：4

起止页码：118

中文期刊名：南京师大学报：社会科学版

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库、北大核心2014、CSSCI2017_2018、北大核心、CSSCI

基金：国家社会科"现象学与神经科学对话中他心问题的重构及其超越研究"(16CZX015)的阶段性成果

语种：中文

中文关键词：具身认知;经典认知;操作性定义;内部效度

外文关键词：embodied cognition; classical cognition; operational definition; intemal validity

中文摘要：近20年来,具身认知作为经典认知科学的"叛逆运动"已经取得了令人瞩目的成就,但该运动内部沉淀的大量积弊亟待给予必要的反思与清理。通过分析具身认知的核心概念、理论假设、实验证据与结论,认为具身认知当前亟需直面并解决三个紧密相连的问题:核心概念的界定问题;理论假设的兼容性问题;论证与解释的有效性问题。若想实现认知科学的范式转型,未来的具身认知研究必须坚定对经典认知的替代,排除其他备择解释,接受贝叶斯检验。

外文摘要：In the last two decades, studies on embodied cognition, as a rebellious movement against the traditional cognitive sciences, have made remarkable achievements. Within this movement, however, there are a lot of problems to be sorted out and examined. Through analyzing its core concepts, hypotheses, experimental evidence and results, we identified three closely connected issues facing the school of embodied cognition. The first issue is about how to define the core concepts concerning embodied cognition. The second is that to what extent the embodied cognition is compatible with classical cognition in theoretical views. The third is that to what extent various arguments and interpretations of embodied cognition are valid. Future researches have to handle the challenges above, since it may determine whether or not embodied cognition is eligible to replace the classical cognition as a new paradigm in cognitive sciences.