文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：供应链低碳技术采纳与产品定价协同决策研究

英文题名：Collaborative Decision of Low-Carbon Technology Adoption and Product Pricing in Supply Chain

作者：蔡小哩[1];丁志刚[2];晚春东[2]

机构：[1]浙江工业职业技术学院商贸学院,浙江绍兴312000;[2]绍兴文理学院商学院,浙江绍兴312000

年份：2018

卷号：34

期号：6

起止页码：51

中文期刊名：生态经济

外文期刊名：Ecological Economy

收录：CSTPCD、、国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库、北大核心2017、北大核心

基金：国家自然科学基金项目“食品供应链质量安全风险演变机理与调控优化模型”(71372175);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“不确定风险下供应链低碳技术采纳决策与协调机制研究”(16YJC630019);浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题“绿色信贷支持浙江生态经济发展效率提升对策研究”(17NDJC136YB);浙江省社科联课题“供给侧改革视角下浙江纺织业节能减排绩效评价研究”(2017N12);绍兴文理学院科研启动项目“浙江高耗能企业低碳技术采纳时机研究”(20155023)

语种：中文

中文关键词：技术采纳;低碳技术;定价策略;协同决策;供应链

外文关键词：technology adoption;low-carbon technology;pricing strategies;collaborative decision-making;supply chain

中文摘要：针对碳交易机制下供应链低碳技术采纳与产品零售定价问题构建各方收益模型,就Stackelberg博弈和协同决策下的制造商、零售商以及供应链总收益进行比较分析,发现协同决策情形下供应链总收益显著高于分散决策情形下的总收益,且采纳的低碳技术水平更高。提出基于线性定价契约的协同收益分配策略,在实现供应链总收益最大化的基础上,实现供应链各成员企业收益的帕累托改进。研究表明：提升消费者低碳消费意愿对企业采纳低碳技术具有直接促进作用;供应链协同决策能获得整体利润最优;基于讨价还价能力的线性定价契约,可保障供应商和零售商得到公平的利润分配,并实现供应链的协调。

外文摘要：Aiming at the adoption of low-carbon technology and pricing of low-carbon products in supply chain under the carbon trading mechanism, the profit model of each partner is constructed, and the profitability of the manufacturer, retailer and supply chain are analyzed and compared under Stackelberg and collaborative game. It is found that the total income of the supply chain obtained by the cooperative decision is higher than which obtained by the decentralized decision, and a higher level of low-carbon technology is adopted. This paper puts forward the co-profit distribution strategy based on the linear pricing contract, and achieves the Pareto improvement of the both enterprises＇ income on the basis of maximizing the total revenue of the supply chain. The results show that： Promotion of the consumers＇ willingness for low-carbon consumption has a direct effect on the adoption of low-carbon technology. The supply chain coordination decision can obtain the best overall profit. The linear pricing contract based on the bargaining power can guarantee the fairness of profit distribution between the suppliers and retailers, and achieve the coordination of supply chain.