文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：战国秦燕史中《荆轲传》辨正三题

英文题名：Three Dialectic Question over “Biography of Jingke” in Qin and Yan Histories of Warring States

作者：叶岗[1]

机构：[1]绍兴文理学院人文学院

年份：2019

卷号：0

期号：4

起止页码：111

中文期刊名：社会科学战线

外文期刊名：Social Science Front

收录：CSTPCD、、国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库、CSSCI2019_2020、北大核心2017、北大核心、社科基金资助期刊、CSSCI

基金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目(11YJA751086)

语种：中文

中文关键词：《荆轲传》;太史公曰;燕太子丹;伤秦王说;司马谈;《太史公自序》

中文摘要：文章针对主要反映战国末期秦燕纠葛的《史记·荆轲传》中的三个问题作出论述,认为太史公排除"天佑说"隐含着对于燕国太子丹历史作用的否定性评价,并以夏无且之亲历来否定流行之"伤秦王说";《荆轲传》的史料来源主要是文字材料而非口传记录;从司马迁生年考证和《太史公自序》中的材料来看,《荆轲传》主要由其父司马谈完成。

外文摘要：This paper discusses the three questions on the biography of Jing Ke in the Records of the Grand Historian(Shiji)resulted from by the disagreement between State Qin and State Yan.It firstly discusses Tai Shi Gong’s thinking of the story that god blessed Prince Dan to avenge was exaggerative,which implies a negative evaluation of Prince Dan’s historical role,and Tai Shi Gong’s using Xia Wuju’s experiences to deny Qin’s First Emperor’s injure in the vengeance.Secondly,this paper holds that written material is an important source of historical data for the biography of Jing Ke.This paper ends with the inference that the biography of Jing Ke was mainly finished by Sima Qian’s father based on Sima Qian’s birth year and the preface by Tai Shi Gong.