文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：当代中西文学政治学的理论异质辨析

英文题名：The Theoretical Differences of Contemporary Literary Politics Between China and the West

作者：范永康[1]

机构：[1]绍兴文理学院人文学院

年份：2017

卷号：0

期号：12

起止页码：11

中文期刊名：上海文化

外文期刊名：Shanghai Culture

收录：北大核心2014、CSSCI_E2017_2018、北大核心、CSSCI

语种：中文

中文关键词：当代中西文学政治学;理论异质;中国特色社会主义文学政治学

中文摘要：文学政治学已经成为当代中西文论中的学术热点之一,当代中西文学政治学合流而非同质,其差异主要表现在4个层面:就历史生成来说,西方文学政治学的形成路线是"去政治化→政治化",中国文学政治学的构建历程为"政治化→去政治化→再政治化";在哲学基础层面,中国建基于马克思主义,西方归属于后马克思主义;在政治内涵层面,中西有宏观政治与微观政治之别;在文学观念层面,就其主流而言,西方是去审美化的,中国则是审美化的。两相比较之后,可以发现,中国文学政治学经过了一个完整的"正—反—合"逻辑链条的历练,显然更加合理。文章最后指出,有必要建构和完善中国特色社会主义文学政治学,但须坚持三项理论原则:审美优先原则、以人为本原则、价值范导原则。

外文摘要：Literary Politics has become a hot academic question in Chinese and Western literary criticism.There are four aspects of differences that signify the confluent rather than identical points of view in Chinese and western literary politics.In historical development,literary politics of the West develops from depoliticizing to politicizing,while Chinese literary politics follows a process from politicizing to depoliticizing and then to re-politicizing.As for the philosophical base,Chinese literary politics is constructed on Marxism instead of post-Marxism which is the base of the western literary politics.The third difference lies in the political meaning with a demarcation between macro-politics and micro-politics for Chinese and western literary politics.The last difference is in literary concepts with Chinese literary politics in favor of aestheticization while the West in favor of de-aestheticization.It is obvious from the differences analysis that Chinese literary politics has evolved along a complete logic and thus seems more reasonable.Therefore,it is necessary to construct and perfect a literary politics with Chinese characteristics,conforming to principles of aesthetic preference,people-first and value-regulation.