文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：后马克思主义的审美意识形态论

英文题名：The Aesthetic Ideology of Post-Marxism

作者：范永康[1];刘锋杰[2]

机构：[1]绍兴文理学院人文学院;[2]苏州大学文学院

年份：2017

卷号：0

期号：1

起止页码：134

中文期刊名：文艺理论研究

外文期刊名：Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art

收录：CSTPCD、、国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库、北大核心2014、CSSCI2017_2018、北大核心、社科基金资助期刊、CSSCI

基金：教育部规划项目"后马克思主义文论研究"[项目编号:13YJA751011];国家社科基金项目"文学政治学的历史形态与当代创新研究"[项目编号:13BZW002]的阶段性成果

语种：中文

中文关键词：审美意识形态;后马克思主义;“机构/制度”

外文关键词：aesthetic ideology; post-Marxism; ＂institutions＂

中文摘要：本文旨在分析后马克思主义审美意识形态理论的哲学基础、理论内涵、理论特征和理论价值。国内影响颇大的审美意识形态理论隶属于传统马克思主义的"问题式",当代西方的审美意识形态理论则归属于后马克思主义的"问题式";前者的哲学依据是历史唯物主义,后者的是文化唯物主义和语言建构主义;前者的理论路径是"反映论"和"观念论",后者的是"建构论"和"实践论"。后马克思主义视域下的审美意识形态不再停留于"形而上"的语言、文化、符号层面,而与"形而下"的物质系统、社会现实融为一体,寄生于"机构/制度"(institutions)之内,从而具备了物质载体和实践效果。与传统马克思主义相比,后马克思主义忽略了审美意识形态的审美功能,更加强调其社会功能,即政治干预功能、文化治理功能和社会区隔功能。后马克思主义审美意识形态论的哲学基础有偏离历史唯物主义之弊,但启示我们建构"日常生活审美意识形态"理论的重要性和必要性。

外文摘要：This paper aims to analyze the philosophical basis, theoretical connotation and theoretical characteristics of the theory of post-Marxist aesthetic ideology. The influential theory about aesthetic ideology in China belongs to the ＂problematic＂ of traditional Marxism, but the contemporary Western aesthetic ideology belongs to the ＇ problematic＇ of post-Marxism. The former is based on historical materialism, and the latter on cultural materialism and language eonstructivism. From the perspective of post-Marxism, aesthetic ideology no longer stays at the ＇ metaphysical＇ linguistic, cultural and symbolic levels; it is integrated with ＂physical＂ material systems and social reality and becomes parasitic within the institutions, thus having material support and practical effects. Compared with traditional Marxism, post-Marxism ignores the aesthetic function of aesthetic ideology, but emphasizes its social function, namely, the function of political interference, cultural governance and social distinctions. The philosophical foundation for the theory of post-Marxist aesthetic ideology has the risks of diverging from historical materialism, but it conveys the significance and necessity of constructing the theory of ＇ aesthetic ideology of everyday life ＇