文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：中国城市便利性对城市化失衡的影响研究

英文题名：Research on the Impact of Urban Amenities on Unbalanced Urbanization in China

作者：张松林[1,2];程瑶[1];郑好青[3];林金官[1]

机构：[1]南京审计大学统计与数据科学学院,江苏南京211815;[2]绍兴文理学院商学院,浙江绍兴312000;[3]浙江工商大学经济学院,浙江杭州310018

年份：2022

卷号：37

期号：7

起止页码：108

中文期刊名：统计与信息论坛

外文期刊名：JOURNAL OF STATISTICS AND INFORMATION

收录：CSTPCD、、国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库、北大核心、CSSCI、北大核心2020、CSSCI2021_2022

基金：浙江省哲学社会科学规划年度课题“基于移动互联网‘空间效应’的长三角城市群人口分布优化研究”(22NDJC032Z);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“长三角区域城市人口收缩的经济效应与应对政策研究”(20YJC790173);国家社会科学基金一般项目“基于审计大数据分析的统计过程控制研究”(20BTJ057)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：城市便利性;城市化失衡;户籍制度;异质性分析

外文关键词：urban amenities;unbalanced urbanization;household registration system;heterogeneity analysis

中文摘要：在城市化过程中,城市便利性是影响迁移人口决策的重要因素,势必成为推进人口城市化的重要动力。现有关于城市便利性的文献虽然围绕迁移人口决策进行了大量研究,但大多忽视迁移人口对城市便利性的获得程度这一重要因素的影响。受户籍制度的限制,迁移人口难以与本地户籍人口一样获得城市便利性。因此,结合土地财政和户籍制度探究城市便利性对城市化失衡的影响机制,以中国2009—2018年277个地级及以上城市为样本进行对应的实证检验。研究表明:第一,以土地出让收入为核心的土地财政制度使地方政府对推动土地城市化具有强烈动机,且土地城市化对城市便利性程度具有正效应,但此过程中提高的城市便利性程度对人口城市化具有负效应,从而导致土地城市化与人口城市化之间的失衡;第二,对于东中部、城市群内的城市来说,城市便利性程度对城市化失衡的影响显著为正,但西部地区、城市群外的城市不显著,其中大城市便利性程度的提高促使城市化失衡的概率相对较高;第三,从分时序阶段看,无论是2009—2013年还是2014—2018年,城市便利性程度对城市化失衡的影响都显著为正,但2014—2018年城市便利性程度的系数绝对值和显著性均出现一定程度提升。据此,围绕协调提高不同规模城市的便利性程度及其获得程度提出相关建议,以促进土地城市化与人口城市化的协调发展。

外文摘要：In the process of urbanization,urban amenity is an important factor affecting the decision-making of migrant population,and it is bound to become an important driving force to promote population urbanization.Although the existing literature on urban amenities has done a lot on the decision-making of migrants,most of them ignore the impact of acquisition of urban amenities for migrants.Restricted by the registered residence system,it is difficult for the migrant population to obtain the same urban amenities as the local registered residence population.Therefore,combined with land finance and registered residence system,we explore the impact mechanism of urban amenities on urbanization imbalance,and take 277 prefecture level and above cities in China from 2009 to 2018 as samples for corresponding empirical tests.The research shows that:firstly,the land financial system with land transfer income as the core makes local governments have a strong motivation to promote land urbanization,and land urbanization has a positive effect on the degree of urban amenities,but the degree of urban amenities improved in this process has a negative effect on population urbanization,resulting in the imbalance between land urbanization and population urbanization;Secondly,for the cities in the East and Middle region,as well as urban agglomerations,the degree of urban amenities has a significant positive impact on the urbanization imbalance,but it is not significant in the West and cities outside the urban agglomerations.Among them,the improvement of the degree of amenity of large cities has a relatively high probability of urbanization imbalance;Thirdly,from the perspective of time series,whether in 2009-2013 or 2014-2018,the impact of urban amenities on unbalanced urbanization is significantly positive,but the absolute value and significance of the coefficient of urban amenities in 2014-2018 have increased to a certain extent.Accordingly,we put forward relevant suggestions for coordinatly improving the urban amenities and the accessibility for migrants in different size of cities,to achieve a long-term sustainable and coordinated development of land and population urbanization.