详细信息
预测加工:走出两代认知科学的历史僵局 被引量:2
Predictive Processing:Breaking the Impasse of Two Generations of Cognitive Science
文献类型:期刊文献
中文题名:预测加工:走出两代认知科学的历史僵局
英文题名:Predictive Processing:Breaking the Impasse of Two Generations of Cognitive Science
作者:董达[1,2,3];陈巍[1]
机构:[1]绍兴文理学院大脑、心智与教育研究中心,绍兴312000;[2]浙江大学哲学系,杭州310007;[3]浙江大学语言与认知研究中心,杭州310007
年份:2022
卷号:45
期号:1
起止页码:235
中文期刊名:心理科学
外文期刊名:Journal of Psychological Science
收录:CSTPCD、、国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库、社科基金资助期刊、北大核心、CSCD、CSSCI、北大核心2020、CSCD_E2021_2022、CSSCI2021_2022
基金:国家社科基金青年项目(20CZX015);浙江省哲学社会科学规划新兴交叉学科重大扶持项目(21XXJC05ZD);中国博士后科学基金特别资助(2019T120530)和中国博士后科学基金面上资助(2019M652134)的资助。
语种:中文
中文关键词:预测加工;层级预测编码;自由能原理;主动推断
外文关键词:predictive processing;hierarchical predictive coding;free energy principle;active inference
中文摘要:表征-计算观与具身行动观对认知的本质几乎做了截然相反的强调。近年来,预测加工理论的发展为统一两代认知科学提供了契机。预测加工是层级预测加工与主动预测加工这两大理论部件的合称,前一部件主要继承了第一代认知科学中的层级计算加工进路,后一部件则发扬了第二代认知科学中与行动有关的理论,这两大理论部件被视为同一个统一整合理论的两个不同方面。在当代,预测加工被认为有望成为未来认知科学的新范式。
外文摘要:Nowadays,quarrels and fights between two generations of cognitive science almost result in an inevitable impasse.For instance,a deep theoretical relation between J.J.Gibson and David Marr have been carved off,and of which two theories each other have been pushed toward the opposite side;which could be viewed as a portrayal of these overt states of affairs.The central tenet of the First-Generation Cognitive Science summarizes as:The Representational-Computational Approach;and the central tenet of the Second-Generation Cognitive Science:The Embodied Action Approach.What is the nature of“mind”at all?These two approaches conflict each other;and the either/or choice seems the only game in the town.In recent years,researchers attempt to integrate both strains of sources,hoping to provide a unified framework,thus of which could be viewed as prospectively breaking the impasse of two generations of cognitive science in the near future.It is called“Predictive Processing”.This approach apparently originates in hierarchal predictive coding of visual and auditory studies(since 1980 s),and thereby has been modified substantively by the neuroscientist Karl Friston,et al.,into a mode of action-oriented.Predictive Processing combines with two indispensable components:Hierarchical Predictive Processing and Active Predictive Processing.In rough,the Hierarchical Predictive Processing mainly inherits from hierarchical predictive coding theories of the First-Generation Cognitive Science(e.g.,Marr’s multi-level computational theory of vision,hierarchical neural networks,etc.);and the Active Predictive Processing somehow advocates various versions of theories of the Second-Generation Cognitive Science related with action(e.g.,Gibson’s affordances theory,enactive cognition,etc.).Both components could be viewed as dual aspect of a single unified theory.In Predictive Processing,the Free Energy Principle views adaptivity as the fundamental principle of the theory construction of neural and cognitive systems,and until self-organizing adaptive systems.The overall aim of Hierarchical Predictive Processing is to make the cognitive agency adaptable and sustainable as much as possible.Next,the optimization problem of adaptation turns into problems of surprising minimization or“prediction errors minimization”by means of Bayesian inference and Bayesian statistics.The basic working mechanism of Hierarchical Predictive Processing is the ascending prediction-descending prediction errors tradeoffs.The so-called“Active Inference”is the complementary component of Free Energy Principle,which is seen by Paul Cisek et al.,is confirmed with multiple affordances competition mechanism.The Active Predictive Processing shows perception-action tradeoffs,or“epistemic-pragmatic tradeoffs”.Both perception(epistemic value)and action(pragmatic value)ultimately serve for adaptivity(adaptive value).Perception-action cycle of Predictive Processing could be regarded as a second-order cycle based on first-order embodied reflex arc(in Deweyan sense);which could also be seen as an internalized closed loop within the corporal brain.Thus on the nature of cognition,contrasting with past two generations of cognitive science,Predictive Processing has made revolutionary breakthrough.Cognition as the systematic function of general adaptive system complies with the fundamental adaptivity principle.The conventional object-invariants analysis beneath paradigms of two generations of cognitive science,thus ought to give way to mind-world adaptivity analysis underlying the Predictive Processing paradigm.Philosophically speaking,Predictive Processing seems to be consistent with a process theory.In the end,on the basis of the currents and trends of Predictive Processing,we attempt to propose an integrated view.In our view,the pressing contemporary task of Predictive Processing is trying to integrate two generations of cognitive science-Representational-Computational Approach and Embodied Action Approach.
参考文献:
正在载入数据...