文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：政府主导型生态补偿的多中心治理——基于农户社会网络的视角

英文题名：Polycentric governance of government-led ecological compensation:Based on the perspective of farmers'social network

作者：陈海江[1];司伟[2];刘泽琦[2];李朝柱[3];张燕燕[4]

机构：[1]绍兴文理学院商学院,绍兴312000;[2]中国农业大学经济与管理学院,北京100083;[3]浙江农林大学暨阳学院,绍兴311800;[4]上海财经大学公共经济与管理学院,上海200433

年份：2020

卷号：42

期号：5

起止页码：812

中文期刊名：资源科学

外文期刊名：Resources Science

收录：CSTPCD、、CSSCI2019_2020、北大核心2017、CSCD2019_2020、北大核心、CSSCI、CSCD

基金：农业农村部软科学项目(RRX2019019A);国家大豆产业技术体系专项(CRAS-04-07B);浙江省社科规划项目(20NDQN324YB)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：社会网络;多中心治理;生态补偿;政府主导;粮豆轮作;可持续性

外文关键词：social network;polycentric governance;ecological compensation;governmentled;grain-bean rotation;sustainability

中文摘要：政府主导型生态补偿由于补偿资金来源单一,因此项目提供的生态服务通常和政策周期同步,持续性较差。本文以改善该类生态补偿项目生态服务的持续性为目标,以粮豆轮作补贴这一政府主导型生态补偿为例,基于多中心治理理论和二元Probit模型、双变量Probit模型研究了社会网络对农户粮豆轮作决策的影响,探索实现政府主导型生态补偿项目多中心治理的路径。研究结果显示:①亲缘社会网络显著促进农户进行粮豆轮作,而友缘社会网络对农户粮豆轮作决策的影响不显著;②亲缘社会网络有助于农户将粮豆轮作意愿转化为具体行为。结合以上两点推断:亲缘社会网络可以成为政府补偿之外的激励机制,促进农户进行粮豆轮作。本文的研究结论支持政府主导型生态补偿项目采取政府补偿+自主治理(社会网络)这一多中心治理模式。这对于提高长江流域和黄淮海地区正在实施的轮作补贴项目生态服务的持续性具有一定的政策启示,同时对此后出台的政府主导型生态补偿政策亦具有一定的借鉴意义。

外文摘要：Government-led ecological compensation has a single source of funding, therefore, the ecological services provided by the projects are usually synchronized with the policy cycle, and has poor sustainability. This paper aims to improve the sustainability of ecological services in such ecological compensation projects, and takes grain-bean rotation subsidy, a government-led ecological compensation, as an example.Based on the polycentric governance theory, Dual Probit model and Bivariate Probit model, this paper studied the influence of social network on farmers’ crop rotation decision, and explored the path to realize polycentric governance of government-led ecological compensation project. The results show that:(1) Kin social network significantly promoted the adoption of grain-bean rotation technology by the farmers, while friend social network had no significant influence on the adoption of grain-bean rotation technology by the farmers.(2) The kin social network can help farmers to transform their willingness to practice grain-bean rotation into specific behaviors. Based on the above two points, it can be concluded that kin social network can be another mechanism besides government compensation to promote grainbean rotation among farmers. The research result supports that government-led ecological compensation projects can adopt the polycentric governance model of government compensation +autonomous governance(social network). This has certain policy implications for improving the sustainability of the ecological services of the current grain-bean rotation subsidy projects in the Yangtze River Basin and the Huang-Huai-Hai Region, as well as certain reference significance for other government-led ecological compensation projects in the future.