文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：大学生的依恋类型、社会支持与孤独感

英文题名：Adult attachment, social support and loneliness of Chinese college students

作者：李同归[1];万露[2];秦和平[3];何吉波[1];王新暖[4];郭晓飞[5]

机构：[1]北京大学心理学系,北京100871;[2]西安体育学院研究生部;[3]抚顺煤矿脑科医院;[4]石家庄铁道学院;[5]绍兴文理学院教育系

年份：2008

卷号：17

期号：12

起止页码：1115

中文期刊名：中国行为医学科学

外文期刊名：Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science

收录：CSCD_E2011_2012、CSCD

基金：国家自然科学基金资助项目（70572007）

语种：中文

中文关键词：成人依恋;社会支持;孤独感

外文关键词：Adult attachment ; Social support ; Loneliness

中文摘要：目的探讨不同依恋类型大学生的社会支持水平以及孤独感之间的关系。方法用关系问卷（RQ）和亲密关系经历量表（ECR）测量成人依恋，用社会支持问卷和UCLA孤独感量表分别测量被试的社会支持与孤独感。结果①成人依恋类型分布为：安全型40．1％，轻视型27．7％，矛盾型20．8％，害怕型11．5％。②女性的主观支持（t（548）=5．59，P〈0．01）、和社会支持总分（t（544）=3．69，P〈0．01）显著高于男性；依恋焦虑没有性别差异，但男性的依恋回避得分显著高于女性（t（528）=2．91，P〈0．01）；在孤独感的得分上没有表现出性别差异。③不同依恋类型的个体在客观支持（F（3.482）=3.74，P〈0．05）、主观支持（F（3.482）=2.80，P〈0．05）、支持的可利用度（F（3.482）=3.14，P〈0．05）以及社会支持总分（F（3.482）=5.67，P〈0．01）4个指标上均有显著差异。且在孤独感量表的得分上也存在显著差异（F（3.482）=8．34，P〈0．01），表现为安全型个体的孤独感显著低于非安全型的个体，而害怕型依恋的个体报告的孤独感最高。④孤独感与依恋回避和依恋焦虑存在显著的正相关（r=0．249～0．348，P〈0．01）；而与社会支持的各项指标均存在显著的负相关（r=-0．258～-0．409，P〈0．01）。结论大学生的依恋类型、社会支持以及孤独感之间存在密切的联系。

外文摘要：Objective To explore the relationship of adult attachment with social support and loneliness of Chinese college students. Methods Relationship questionnaire （RQ） and experience of close relationships （ECR） inventory were used to measure subjects＇ adult attachment. Social support questionnaire comprised of objective support, subjective support and availability of social support. The UCLA loneliness scale was adopted to measure subjects＇ loneliness. Results ① Distribution of adult attachment style： 40. 1% secure subjects, 27.7% dismissing, 20.8% preoccupied, and 11.5% fearful. ②The score of subjective support, and total score of social support were significantly higher in females than in males （t （548） = 5.59, P 〈 0.01; t （544） = 3.69, P 〈 0.01 ） ,but there was no significant differences on score of loneliness between females and males. ③Subjects differing in adult attachment styles varied significantly in all indexes of social support and score of loneliness. Secure subjects got higher scores in social support and lower score of loneliness than those insecure subjects. ④ Score of loneliness had significantly positive correlations with attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety （r = 0. 249 0.348, P〈 0.01 ）, and significantly negative correlations with all indexes of social support （r = -0. 258 -0. 409, P〈0.01 ）. ⑤ Attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, subjective support and total score of social support all entered the regression equation for loneliness. Conclusion Adult attachment was closely related to individual＇ s social support and loneliness among college students.