文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：从卢卡奇到詹姆逊:“总体性”文艺意识形态论的演进及其缺失

英文题名：From Lukacs to Jameson:The Evolution and Lack of“Totality”Literary Ideology

作者：范永康[1]

机构：[1]绍兴文理学院人文学院

年份：2022

期号：2

起止页码：69

中文期刊名：美学与艺术评论

外文期刊名：Journal of Aesthetics and Art Review

基金：国家社科基金重大招标项目“马克思主义经典文艺思想中国化当代化研究”(项目编号:17ZDA269)的阶段性成果

语种：中文

中文关键词：卢卡奇;戈德曼;詹姆逊;总体性;文艺意识形态

外文关键词：Lukacs;Goldman;Jameson;totality;literary ideology

中文摘要：“总体性”作为一个重要的哲学范畴成熟于西方马克思主义,为文艺意识形态论确立了一个特别宏观的理论视野。卢卡奇构建出“历史总体论”,认为文艺的意识形态性表现在它的反拜物化功能上。戈德曼的“结构总体论”是对卢卡奇和皮亚杰总体性理论的融合,他论证了文艺作品与社会集团、社会阶级之间在精神结构(世界观)层面的整体关联。詹姆逊的“多元总体论”主要是对卢卡奇和阿尔都塞总体性思想的综合,他的“政治阐释学”就是运用“症候阅读法”去揭示文本的“政治无意识”。他们对经典马克思主义文艺意识形态论有所创新和发展,但是,以詹姆逊为代表的后现代马克思主义学者已经背离了马克思主义创始人的审美人学观念,以钱中文为代表的中国马克思主义学者所建构的审美意识形态论对之有纠偏之力。

外文摘要：As an important philosophical category,“totality”has matured in Western Marxism and established a special macro theoretical vision for the theory of literary ideology.Lukacs constructed the“historical totality”and believed that the ideological nature of literature and art was manifested in the function of anti worship and materialization.Goldman's“structural totality”is the integration of Lukacs and Piaget's totality theory,and demonstrates the overall relationship between literary works and social classes at the level of spiritual structure(world outlook).Jameson's“pluralistic totality”is mainly the synthesis of Lukacs and Althusser's totality thought.His“political hermeneutics”uses“symptomatic reading method”to reveal the“political unconsciousness”of the text.They have innovated and developed the classical Marxist literary ideology theory.However,the postmodern Marxist scholars represented by Jameson have deviated from the aesthetic humanistic concept of the founder of Marxism,and the aesthetic ideology theory constructed by the chinese marxist scholars represented by Qian Zhongwen has the power to correct it.